Xeon w5-2545 vs E5-2658 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
9.09
Xeon w5-2545
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 210 Watt
26.24
+189%

Xeon w5-2545 outperforms Xeon E5-2658 v4 by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking839183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8483.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.1911.83
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,832$889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w5-2545 has 4427% better value for money than Xeon E5-2658 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2824
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache3.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache35 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size306.18 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4700 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1,536 GB2 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4064

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 9.09
Xeon w5-2545 26.24
+189%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 14434
Xeon w5-2545 41688
+189%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.09 26.24
Recency 20 June 2016 24 August 2024
Physical cores 14 12
Threads 28 24
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 210 Watt

Xeon E5-2658 v4 has 16.7% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-2545, on the other hand, has a 188.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 years.

The Xeon w5-2545 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2658 v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon w5-2545 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 v4 and Xeon w5-2545, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 v4
Xeon E5-2658 v4
Intel Xeon w5-2545
Xeon w5-2545

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-2545 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 v4 or Xeon w5-2545, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.