A6-9500E vs Xeon E5-2658 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 v4
2016
14 cores / 28 threads, 105 Watt
9.09
+719%
A6-9500E
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.11

Xeon E5-2658 v4 outperforms A6-9500E by a whopping 719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8392396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.84no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.193.00
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)27 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,832no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 9.6 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L2 cache3.5 MB1024 KB
L3 cache35 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size306.18 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataAM4
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Enduro-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 9.09
+719%
A6-9500E 1.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 v4 14434
+722%
A6-9500E 1756

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.09 1.11
Recency 20 June 2016 27 July 2017
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2658 v4 has a 718.9% higher aggregate performance score, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

A6-9500E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2658 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9500E in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2658 v4 is a mobile workstation processor while A6-9500E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 v4 and A6-9500E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 v4
Xeon E5-2658 v4
AMD A6-9500E
A6-9500E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 48 votes

Rate A6-9500E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 v4 or A6-9500E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.