Xeon W-2123 vs E5-2658 V3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2658 V3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 105 Watt
8.49
+59.3%
Xeon W-2123
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 120 Watt
5.33

Xeon E5-2658 V3 outperforms Xeon W-2123 by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8881170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.64
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.654.20
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)8.25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2484 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
Socket2011-3FCLGA2066
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data512 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2658 V3 8.49
+59.3%
Xeon W-2123 5.33

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2658 V3 13487
+59.2%
Xeon W-2123 8472

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.49 5.33
Recency 8 September 2014 29 August 2017
Physical cores 12 4
Threads 24 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon E5-2658 V3 has a 59.3% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-2123, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2658 V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2123 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2658 V3 and Xeon W-2123, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2658 V3
Xeon E5-2658 V3
Intel Xeon W-2123
Xeon W-2123

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2658 V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2123 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2658 V3 or Xeon W-2123, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.