Athlon II X2 250 vs Xeon E5-2650L v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650L v3
2014
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
7.62
+1004%
Athlon II X2 250
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.69

Xeon E5-2650L v3 outperforms Athlon II X2 250 by a whopping 1004% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9642723
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.61
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency10.890.99
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)2 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads242
Base clock speed1.8 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache30 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size356 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,600 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650L v3 7.62
+1004%
Athlon II X2 250 0.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650L v3 11880
+1000%
Athlon II X2 250 1080

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.62 0.69
Recency 8 September 2014 2 June 2009
Physical cores 12 2
Threads 24 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm

Xeon E5-2650L v3 has a 1004.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2650L v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650L v3 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X2 250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Athlon II X2 250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650L v3
Xeon E5-2650L v3
AMD Athlon II X2 250
Athlon II X2 250

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 61 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2650L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1152 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650L v3 or Athlon II X2 250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.