Celeron 3965Y vs Xeon E5-2650

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.64
+519%
Celeron 3965Y
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.75

Xeon E5-2650 outperforms Celeron 3965Y by a whopping 519% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12802649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.34no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.6211.83
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)21 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$91no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataOPI
Bus rate8 GT/s4 GT/s
Multiplierno data13
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1515
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Smart Responseno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB16 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 615
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 4.64
+519%
Celeron 3965Y 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 7370
+517%
Celeron 3965Y 1194

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2650 397
+23.7%
Celeron 3965Y 321

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2650 2455
+335%
Celeron 3965Y 565

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.64 0.75
Recency 6 March 2012 21 April 2017
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 has a 518.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron 3965Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3965Y in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 3965Y is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 and Celeron 3965Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650
Xeon E5-2650
Intel Celeron 3965Y
Celeron 3965Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 178 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 31 vote

Rate Celeron 3965Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 or Celeron 3965Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.