Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	881	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.61	no data
Market segment	Server	Laptop
Series	Intel Xeon E5	2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency	7.69	no data
Architecture codename	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Puma (2008−2009)
Release date	20 June 2016 (8 years ago)	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,166	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	12 (Dodeca-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	24	2
Base clock speed	2.2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.9 GHz	2.1 GHz
Bus type	QPI	no data
Bus rate	2 × 9.6 GT/s	3600 MHz
Multiplier	22	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	256 KB
L2 cache	3 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	30 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Die size	306.18 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	80 °C	no data
Number of transistors	4700 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX2	MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
PowerNow	-	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	-
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
PAE	46 Bit	no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	+	no data
OS Guard	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400	DDR2
Maximum memory size	1.5 TB	no data
Max memory channels	4	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

N/A

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	40	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 June 2016	3 June 2008
Physical cores	12	2
Threads	24	2
Chip lithography	14 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	105 Watt	32 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-80, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---