Atom Z2580 vs Xeon E5-2650 v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 831 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.41 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Clovertrail (2013) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,166 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 12 (Dodeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus support | 2 × 9.6 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 30 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 306.18 mm2 | 65 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 80 °C | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4700 Million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel BGA 617 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 8.5 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 27 February 2013 |
| Physical cores | 12 | 2 |
| Threads | 24 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 3 Watt |
Xeon E5-2650 v4 has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
Atom Z2580, on the other hand, has 3400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z2580 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v4 and Atom Z2580, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
