Xeon Gold 5222 vs E5-2650 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2650 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
6.21
+4%
Xeon Gold 5222
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
5.97

Xeon E5-2650 v2 outperforms Xeon Gold 5222 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10741095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.465.12
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency6.195.38
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$650$1,221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5222 has 108% better value for money than Xeon E5-2650 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature75 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration24 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size768 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 6.21
+4%
Xeon Gold 5222 5.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2650 v2 9864
+4%
Xeon Gold 5222 9489

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.21 5.97
Recency 1 September 2013 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5-2650 v2 has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 10.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5222, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2650 v2 and Xeon Gold 5222, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Xeon Gold 5222
Xeon Gold 5222

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4473 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2650 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5222 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2650 v2 or Xeon Gold 5222, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.