i9-14900F vs Xeon E5-2640

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1423	141
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.75	48.99
Market segment	Server	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	3.94	43.28
Architecture codename	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date	6 March 2012 (12 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$162	$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900F has 1206% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	12	32
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3 GHz	5.6 GHz
Bus rate	7.2 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
L3 cache	15360 KB (shared)	36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	Intel 7 nm
Die size	435 mm2	257 mm2
Maximum core temperature	73 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	2,270 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	1
Socket	FCLGA2011	FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	+
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	no data	+
Deep Learning Boost	-	+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+
Secure Key	no data	+
OS Guard	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	384 GB	192 GB
Max memory channels	4	2
Maximum memory bandwidth	42.6 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes	40	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.11	30.85
Recency	6 March 2012	8 January 2024
Physical cores	6	24
Threads	12	32
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---