Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
8.16
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.60
+17.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v4 by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking940819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.73no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency8.2713.47
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2430
L1 cacheno data768 KB
L2 cache2.5 MB4 MB
L3 cache25 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2213 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 8.16
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 9.60
+17.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12488
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 14693
+17.7%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1048
+1.2%
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 1036

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5650
+8.4%
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 5214

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.16 9.60
Recency 20 June 2016 29 June 2017
Physical cores 10 8
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 25% more physical cores and 25% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, on the other hand, has a 17.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 38.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2640 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 913 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 98 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Ryzen 7 PRO 1700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.