i3-3210 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 90 Watt
8.01
+460%
Core i3-3210
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.43

Xeon E5-2640 v4 outperforms Core i3-3210 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9422209
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.700.13
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.272.41
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$939$120

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has 1977% better value for money than i3-3210.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads204
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s5 GT/s
Multiplier24no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2.5 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache25 MB3072 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size246.24 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX
AES-NI+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
FDIno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+-
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 2500
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 8.01
+460%
i3-3210 1.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 12488
+461%
i3-3210 2227

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 1047
+107%
i3-3210 506

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v4 5641
+449%
i3-3210 1028

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.01 1.43
Recency 20 June 2016 1 January 2013
Physical cores 10 2
Threads 20 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v4 has a 460.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 400% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

i3-3210, on the other hand, has 63.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3210 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-3210 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v4 and Core i3-3210, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
Xeon E5-2640 v4
Intel Core i3-3210
Core i3-3210

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 936 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 265 votes

Rate Core i3-3210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v4 or Core i3-3210, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.