Celeron N3450 vs Xeon E5-2640 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
7.00
+460%
Celeron N3450
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.25

Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Celeron N3450 by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10002297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency7.3619.72
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.6 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C105 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guard++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size768 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes406
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 7.00
+460%
Celeron N3450 1.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 11124
+460%
Celeron N3450 1987

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 1053
+332%
Celeron N3450 244

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v3 5471
+708%
Celeron N3450 677

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.00 1.25
Recency 8 September 2014 30 August 2016
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v3 has a 460% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron N3450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v3 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N3450 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v3 and Celeron N3450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
Xeon E5-2640 v3
Intel Celeron N3450
Celeron N3450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2739 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 152 votes

Rate Celeron N3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v3 or Celeron N3450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.