Athlon 3000G vs Xeon E5-2640 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2640 v2
2013
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.78
+69.5%
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82

Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms Athlon 3000G by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12591681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.295.27
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency4.767.63
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EP (2013)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$728$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 3000G has 309% better value for money than Xeon E5-2640 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature75 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB?
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes406

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 4.78
+69.5%
Athlon 3000G 2.82

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 7590
+69.6%
Athlon 3000G 4476

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 395
Athlon 3000G 956
+142%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2640 v2 2377
+21.4%
Athlon 3000G 1958

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.78 2.82
Recency 1 September 2013 7 November 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2640 v2 has a 69.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2640 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 3000G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2640 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2640 v2 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Xeon E5-2640 v2
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 359 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2640 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2112 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2640 v2 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.