Xeon E5-2603 v3 vs E5-2637 v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2637 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 135 Watt
4.73
+88.4%

Xeon E5-2637 v3 outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v3 by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12901759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.192.69
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate9.6 GT/s6.4 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)15 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size356 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C73 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bit46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-1600
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s51 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2637 v3 4.73
+88.4%
Xeon E5-2603 v3 2.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2637 v3 7246
+89%
Xeon E5-2603 v3 3834

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2637 v3 1145
+117%
Xeon E5-2603 v3 527

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2637 v3 4568
+125%
Xeon E5-2603 v3 2030

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.73 2.51
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 8 6
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E5-2637 v3 has a 88.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more threads.

Xeon E5-2603 v3, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores, and 58.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2637 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2603 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2637 v3 and Xeon E5-2603 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2637 v3
Xeon E5-2637 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2603 v3
Xeon E5-2603 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 37 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2637 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 8 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2603 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2637 v3 or Xeon E5-2603 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.