Xeon E3-1268L v5 vs E5-2630L v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2630L v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
6.32
+58%
Xeon E3-1268L v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
4.00

Xeon E5-2630L v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1268L v5 by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10601417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.591.60
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon E3
Power efficiency10.8310.77
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Skylake-DT (2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$612$377

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 has 62% better value for money than Xeon E3-1268L v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads208
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeQPIDMI 3.0
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1824
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache2.5 MB1 MB
L3 cache25 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2122 mm2
Maximum core temperature62 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million1,750 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA20111151
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size1.5 TB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics P530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 6.32
+58%
Xeon E3-1268L v5 4.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 10000
+57.9%
Xeon E3-1268L v5 6334

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.32 4.00
Recency 20 June 2016 19 October 2015
Physical cores 10 4
Threads 20 8
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2630L v4 has a 58% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Xeon E3-1268L v5, on the other hand, has 57.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2630L v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1268L v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2630L v4 and Xeon E3-1268L v5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4
Xeon E5-2630L v4
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v5
Xeon E3-1268L v5

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 14 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1268L v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2630L v4 or Xeon E3-1268L v5, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.