Xeon E5-2630 v3 vs E5-2628L v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2628L v4
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 75 Watt
6.97
+6.7%
Xeon E5-2630 v3
2014
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.53

Xeon E5-2628L v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10031044
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.797.27
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,364no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier19no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache30 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size306.18 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Number of transistors4700 Million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866
Maximum memory size1,536 GB768 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data59 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2628L v4 6.97
+6.7%
Xeon E5-2630 v3 6.53

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2628L v4 11079
+6.9%
Xeon E5-2630 v3 10367

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.97 6.53
Recency 20 June 2016 8 September 2014
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon E5-2628L v4 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2628L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon E5-2630 v3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2628L v4 and Xeon E5-2630 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2628L v4
Xeon E5-2628L v4
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
Xeon E5-2630 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5-2628L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 760 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2628L v4 or Xeon E5-2630 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.