Xeon Bronze 3408U vs E5-2620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.33
Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.02
+80.8%

Xeon Bronze 3408U outperforms Xeon E5-2620 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15741092
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7327.68
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.324.56
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Bronze 3408U has 1500% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)22.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4000
Maximum memory size384 GB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.33
Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.02
+80.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 5291
Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557
+80.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 6.02
Recency 6 March 2012 10 January 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 has 50% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon Bronze 3408U, on the other hand, has a 80.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 33.3% more physical cores.

The Xeon Bronze 3408U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 515 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Xeon Bronze 3408U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.