Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U vs Xeon E5-2620

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.39
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.80
+41.6%

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Xeon E5-2620 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15721264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.73no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency3.3129.72
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)8 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size435 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FP5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4012

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.39
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 4.80
+41.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 5291
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 7475
+41.3%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 405
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 945
+133%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 1960
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U 3043
+55.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.39 4.80
Recency 6 March 2012 8 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, on the other hand, has a 41.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 515 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 139 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.