Phenom II X4 925 vs Xeon E5-2620

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.33
+133%
Phenom II X4 925
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.43

Xeon E5-2620 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15742187
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.730.10
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.321.42
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)11 May 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$36$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2620 has 1630% better value for money than Phenom II X4 925.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size435 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 3.33
+133%
Phenom II X4 925 1.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 5291
+133%
Phenom II X4 925 2272

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 405
+25.8%
Phenom II X4 925 322

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 1960
+103%
Phenom II X4 925 966

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 1.43
Recency 6 March 2012 11 May 2009
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Xeon E5-2620 has a 132.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X4 925 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X4 925 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 and Phenom II X4 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Phenom II X4 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 515 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 323 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 or Phenom II X4 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.