Celeron E3400 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
5.82
+958%
Celeron E3400
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.55

Xeon E5-2620 v4 outperforms Celeron E3400 by a whopping 958% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11152832
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.363.72
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.480.80
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)17 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417$76

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron E3400 has 11% better value for money than Xeon E5-2620 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache20 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size246.24 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors3200 Million228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 5.82
+958%
Celeron E3400 0.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 9248
+964%
Celeron E3400 869

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 842
+190%
Celeron E3400 290

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 4439
+815%
Celeron E3400 485

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.82 0.55
Recency 20 June 2016 17 January 2010
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-2620 v4 has a 958.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron E3400, on the other hand, has 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron E3400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2620 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron E3400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Celeron E3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
Xeon E5-2620 v4
Intel Celeron E3400
Celeron E3400

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 98 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 268 votes

Rate Celeron E3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2620 v4 or Celeron E3400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.