Xeon Gold 6161 vs E5-2618L v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 945 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.22 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | Intel Xeon Gold |
| Power efficiency | 9.87 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $779 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 22 (Docosa-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 44 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 2 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 22 | 22 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.375 MB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 22 MB |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 30.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 4 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | Socket P |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 128.001 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 10 | 22 |
| Threads | 20 | 44 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 165 Watt |
Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 120% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6161, on the other hand, has 120% more physical cores and 120% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon Gold 6161 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon Gold 6161, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
