EPYC Embedded 3301 vs Xeon E5-2618L v4
Primary details
Comparing Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 943 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.26 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon E5 | AMD EPYC Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 9.87 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 20 June 2016 (8 years ago) | 21 February 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $779 | $450 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | QPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 2 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 22 | 20 |
| L1 cache | no data | 1152 KB |
| L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 25 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 246.24 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 3200 Million | 9600 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory size | 1,536 GB | 1 TiB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 40 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 June 2016 | 21 February 2018 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 12 |
| Threads | 20 | 12 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 66.7% more threads.
EPYC Embedded 3301, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 20% more physical cores, and 15.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while EPYC Embedded 3301 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2618L v4 and EPYC Embedded 3301, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
