Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon E5-2609

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2609
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.83
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.94
+225%

Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 by a whopping 225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20071112
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.71no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.128.49
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$143no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size294 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,270 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011AM4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size384 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2609 1.83
Ryzen 5 3400G 5.94
+225%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 2858
Ryzen 5 3400G 9252
+224%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2609 409
Ryzen 5 3400G 1133
+177%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2609 1283
Ryzen 5 3400G 3632
+183%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 5.94
Recency 6 March 2012 12 June 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 3400G has a 224.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 23.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2609 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3400G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609
Xeon E5-2609
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2119 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.