N200 vs Xeon E5-2609

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2609
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.80

N200 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20201613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.86no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency2.1350.44
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)no data
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$143no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 and N200.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2609 1.80
N200 3.20
+77.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 2858
N200 5083
+77.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 3.20
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

N200 has a 77.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The N200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2609 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 is a server/workstation processor while N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609
Xeon E5-2609
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.