Atom N2600 vs Xeon E5-2609

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2007not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.71no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.12no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EP (2012)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 December 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$143$47

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size294 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,270 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt3.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB2.44 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2609 2858
+694%
Atom N2600 360

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2609 409
+445%
Atom N2600 75

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2609 1283
+511%
Atom N2600 210

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 1 December 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 3 Watt

Xeon E5-2609 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more physical cores.

Atom N2600, on the other hand, has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2609 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N2600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2609 and Atom N2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2609
Xeon E5-2609
Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 12 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 181 vote

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2609 or Atom N2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.