Xeon Silver 4410Y vs E5-2608L v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2608L v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 50 Watt
4.69
Xeon Silver 4410Y
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
15.36
+228%

Xeon Silver 4410Y outperforms Xeon E5-2608L v4 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1271451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.4863.10
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency8.889.69
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$363$573

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4410Y has 2444% better value for money than Xeon E5-2608L v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier16no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4000
Maximum memory size1,536 GB4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2608L v4 4.69
Xeon Silver 4410Y 15.36
+228%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2608L v4 7447
Xeon Silver 4410Y 24399
+228%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.69 15.36
Recency 20 June 2016 10 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 200% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4410Y, on the other hand, has a 227.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Xeon Silver 4410Y is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2608L v4 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2608L v4 is a mobile workstation processor while Xeon Silver 4410Y is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon Silver 4410Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2608L v4
Xeon E5-2608L v4
Intel Xeon Silver 4410Y
Xeon Silver 4410Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2608L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 26 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4410Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2608L v4 or Xeon Silver 4410Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.