Xeon Gold 5416S vs E5-2603 v4

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2603 v4
2016
6 cores / 6 threads, 85 Watt
3.01
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
23.08
+667%

Xeon Gold 5416S outperforms Xeon E5-2603 v4 by a whopping 667% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1643231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.4963.99
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.2914.29
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$213$944

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 4195% better value for money than Xeon E5-2603 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads632
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeQPIno data
Bus rate2 × 6.4 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes4080

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2603 v4 3.01
Xeon Gold 5416S 23.08
+667%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2603 v4 4695
Xeon Gold 5416S 35976
+666%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.01 23.08
Recency 20 June 2016 10 January 2023
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 6 32
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon E5-2603 v4 has 76.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has a 666.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 166.7% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 5416S is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2603 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2603 v4 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2603 v4
Xeon E5-2603 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2603 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2603 v4 or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.