Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon E5-2450

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2450
2012
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
4.74
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 105 Watt
24.39
+415%

Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-2450 by a whopping 415% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1258205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7418.01
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 9
Power efficiency4.7221.98
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)14 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$500$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 3950X has 935% better value for money than Xeon E5-2450.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache20480 KB (shared)64 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size294 mm22 x 72 mm + 125 mm (IO-Die) mm2
Number of transistors1,270 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1356AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX86x MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size384 GB128 GB
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2450 4.74
Ryzen 9 3950X 24.39
+415%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2450 7534
Ryzen 9 3950X 38736
+414%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.74 24.39
Recency 14 May 2012 14 November 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E5-2450 has 10.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 3950X, on the other hand, has a 414.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 3950X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2450 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 3950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2450 and Ryzen 9 3950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2450
Xeon E5-2450
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Ryzen 9 3950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 125 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 713 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 3950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2450 or Ryzen 9 3950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.