Xeon X3480 vs E5-2420

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2420
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.23
+53.8%
Xeon X3480
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.10

Xeon E5-2420 outperforms Xeon X3480 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16051890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.162.05
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)no data
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$390no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.73 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2420 3.23
+53.8%
Xeon X3480 2.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2420 5033
+53.8%
Xeon X3480 3273

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.23 2.10
Recency 14 May 2012 1 April 2010
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Xeon E5-2420 has a 53.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E5-2420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3480 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2420 and Xeon X3480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2420
Xeon E5-2420
Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 806 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2420 or Xeon X3480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.