Celeron G1840 vs Xeon E5-2420 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2420 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
4.08
+258%
Celeron G1840
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 53 Watt
1.14

Xeon E5-2420 v2 outperforms Celeron G1840 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14122391
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.281.35
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.741.96
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$480$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1840 has 5% better value for money than Xeon E5-2420 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2177 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356FCLGA1150
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Max video memoryno data1.7 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+
VGAno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080@60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno data1920x1200@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.1/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840.

PCIe version3.0Up to 3.0
PCI Express lanes2416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 4.08
+258%
Celeron G1840 1.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 6356
+258%
Celeron G1840 1777

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 432
Celeron G1840 482
+11.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 2128
+160%
Celeron G1840 817

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.08 1.14
Recency 1 September 2013 1 May 2014
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 53 Watt

Xeon E5-2420 v2 has a 257.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron G1840, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 50.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2420 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1840 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2420 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1840 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Intel Celeron G1840
Celeron G1840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 667 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2420 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 238 votes

Rate Celeron G1840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2420 v2 or Celeron G1840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.