Celeron G1610T vs Xeon E5-2420 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2420 v2
2013
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
4.15
+377%

Xeon E5-2420 v2 outperforms Celeron G1610T by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14092572
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.296.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency4.732.27
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)3 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$480$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G1610T has 417% better value for money than Xeon E5-2420 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate7.2 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1356FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size384 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 4.15
+377%
Celeron G1610T 0.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 6356
+379%
Celeron G1610T 1327

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 432
+31.3%
Celeron G1610T 329

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-2420 v2 2128
+266%
Celeron G1610T 582

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.15 0.87
Recency 1 September 2013 3 December 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-2420 v2 has a 377% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Celeron G1610T, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2420 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G1610T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2420 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G1610T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2420 v2 and Celeron G1610T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2420 v2
Xeon E5-2420 v2
Intel Celeron G1610T
Celeron G1610T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 666 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2420 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Celeron G1610T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2420 v2 or Celeron G1610T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.