3015e vs Xeon E5-2418L

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2418L
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 50 Watt
2.30
+29.9%

Xeon E5-2418L outperforms 3015e by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18272037
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency4.1926.90
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-EN (2012)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
Socket1356FT5
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2418L 2.30
+29.9%
3015e 1.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2418L 3518
+29.7%
3015e 2712

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.30 1.77
Recency 14 May 2012 4 August 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E5-2418L has a 29.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2418L is our recommended choice as it beats the 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2418L is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2418L and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2418L
Xeon E5-2418L
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2418L on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2418L or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.