Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs Xeon E5-2407 v2

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-2407 v2
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
2.28
+217%
Core 2 Extreme X9000
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.72

Xeon E5-2407 v2 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X9000 by a whopping 217% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18302707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.35no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Extreme
Power efficiency2.611.50
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$476$851

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate6.4 GT/s800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)6 MB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.275V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1356PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes24no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 2.28
+217%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-2407 v2 3504
+219%
Core 2 Extreme X9000 1099

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.28 0.72
Recency 1 September 2013 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 44 Watt

Xeon E5-2407 v2 has a 216.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme X9000, on the other hand, has 81.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2407 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Extreme X9000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-2407 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme X9000 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-2407 v2 and Core 2 Extreme X9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-2407 v2
Xeon E5-2407 v2
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000
Core 2 Extreme X9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 20 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2407 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme X9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-2407 v2 or Core 2 Extreme X9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.