Xeon Silver 4216 vs E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
9.29
Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
13.47
+45%

Xeon Silver 4216 outperforms Xeon E5 1680 v4 by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking851574
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9517.72
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency6.0512.28
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$1,002

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4216 has 809% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier3421
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache20 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1.5 TB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.29 13.47
Recency 20 June 2016 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 100 Watt

Xeon Silver 4216 has a 45% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4216 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5 1680 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Xeon Silver 4216, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 65 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Xeon Silver 4216, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.