Xeon E5-2603 vs E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
+513%
Xeon E5-2603
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
1.46

Xeon E5 1680 v4 outperforms Xeon E5-2603 by a whopping 513% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8542163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.900.29
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency6.051.73
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$207

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has 555% better value for money than Xeon E5-2603.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/s6.4 GT/s
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)10240 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2294 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million1,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access--
Demand Based Switching++
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB384 GB
Max memory channels44
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s34.1 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4040

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 1.46
Recency 20 June 2016 6 March 2012
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has a 513% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5-2603, on the other hand, has 75% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5 1680 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2603 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Xeon E5-2603, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2603
Xeon E5-2603

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2603 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Xeon E5-2603, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.