EPYC 7543P vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
EPYC 7543P
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 225 Watt
41.98
+369%

EPYC 7543P outperforms Xeon E5 1680 v4 by a whopping 369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85656
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.9012.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.0517.66
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7543P has 563% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier3428
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size246.24 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011SP3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes40128

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 41.98
Recency 20 June 2016 15 March 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has 60.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7543P, on the other hand, has a 369.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7543P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5 1680 v4 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and EPYC 7543P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
AMD EPYC 7543P
EPYC 7543P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 67 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 17 votes

Rate EPYC 7543P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or EPYC 7543P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.