i7-9700F vs Xeon E5 1680 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5 1680 v4
2016
8 cores / 16 threads, 140 Watt
8.95
+7.3%
Core i7-9700F
2019
8 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
8.34

Xeon E5 1680 v4 outperforms Core i7-9700F by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking865913
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.959.01
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Core i7
Power efficiency6.0512.14
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,723$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i7-9700F has 362% better value for money than Xeon E5 1680 v4.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3430
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size246.24 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C72 °C
Number of transistors3,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
SIPP-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1.5 TB128 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.95 8.34
Recency 20 June 2016 23 April 2019
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5 1680 v4 has a 7.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F.

Be aware that Xeon E5 1680 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5 1680 v4 and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Xeon E5 1680 v4
Xeon E5 1680 v4
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 70 votes

Rate Xeon E5 1680 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 684 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5 1680 v4 or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.