Pentium Dual-Core E2220 vs Xeon E5-1660

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1660
2012
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
5.29
+530%
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.84

Xeon E5-1660 outperforms Pentium Dual-Core E2220 by a whopping 530% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11752575
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.98no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.851.22
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$290no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (shared)
L3 cache15360 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size435 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,270 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1660 5.29
+530%
Pentium Dual-Core E2220 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1660 8407
+532%
Pentium Dual-Core E2220 1330

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 0.84
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon E5-1660 has a 529.8% higher aggregate performance score, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium Dual-Core E2220, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1660 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual-Core E2220 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1660 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual-Core E2220 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1660 and Pentium Dual-Core E2220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1660
Xeon E5-1660
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220
Pentium Dual-Core E2220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 74 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 84 votes

Rate Pentium Dual-Core E2220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1660 or Pentium Dual-Core E2220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.