Celeron M 310 vs Xeon E5-1650

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1202not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.82no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency3.72no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Banias (2003)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$175no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)512 KB L2
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size435 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors2,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.356V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 24 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 310, on the other hand, has 441.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 and Celeron M 310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650
Xeon E5-1650
Intel Celeron M 310
Celeron M 310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 503 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 or Celeron M 310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.