Celeron B810 vs Xeon E5-1650 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1650 v4
2016
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
7.21
+1371%
Celeron B810
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49

Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Celeron B810 by a whopping 1371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9862890
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.51no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.871.32
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617$86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3616
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TB16.6 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 7.21
+1371%
Celeron B810 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 11452
+1378%
Celeron B810 775

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 1188
+311%
Celeron B810 289

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1650 v4 5475
+937%
Celeron B810 528

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.21 0.49
Recency 20 June 2016 1 March 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 v4 has a 1371.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron B810, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1650 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B810 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron B810 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron B810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Celeron B810
Celeron B810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 456 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Celeron B810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v4 or Celeron B810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.