Celeron 817 vs Xeon E5-1650 v4

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking980not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.47no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.87no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier3616
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L3 cache15 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size246.24 mm2131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011no data
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
FMA-+
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TB16 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon E5-1650 v4 has 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 817, on the other hand, has 723.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 817 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1650 v4 and Celeron 817, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Intel Celeron 817
Celeron 817

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 451 vote

Rate Xeon E5-1650 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Celeron 817 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1650 v4 or Celeron 817, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.