Athlon XP 2200+ vs Xeon E5-1630 v4

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1630 v4
2016
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.79
+3585%
Athlon XP 2200+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.13

Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Athlon XP 2200+ by a whopping 3585% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12543335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.32no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.220.18
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Thorton (2001−2003)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$406$85

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)256 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm130 nm
Die size246.24 mm280 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,400 million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011A
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1630 v4 4.79
+3585%
Athlon XP 2200+ 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1630 v4 7601
+3452%
Athlon XP 2200+ 214

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.79 0.13
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 68 Watt

Xeon E5-1630 v4 has a 3584.6% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon XP 2200+, on the other hand, has 105.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1630 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1630 v4 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon XP 2200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1630 v4 and Athlon XP 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
Xeon E5-1630 v4
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Athlon XP 2200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate Xeon E5-1630 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1630 v4 or Athlon XP 2200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.