Xeon Platinum 8153 vs E5-1630 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1630 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.66
Xeon Platinum 8153
2017
16 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
20.26
+335%

Xeon Platinum 8153 outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 by a whopping 335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1275272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.49
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency3.1515.34
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,115

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache64K (per core)1 MB
L2 cache256K (per core)16 MB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)22 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size356 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature66 °C87 °C
Number of transistors2,600 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size768 GB768 GB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4048

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1630 v3 4.66
Xeon Platinum 8153 20.26
+335%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1630 v3 7397
Xeon Platinum 8153 32180
+335%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.66 20.26
Recency 8 September 2014 25 April 2017
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8153 has a 334.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 12% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8153 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1630 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1630 v3 and Xeon Platinum 8153, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Intel Xeon Platinum 8153
Xeon Platinum 8153

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 56 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1630 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8153 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1630 v3 or Xeon Platinum 8153, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.