Xeon X7550 vs E5-1620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.69
Xeon X7550
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
4.96
+34.4%

Xeon X7550 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14831225
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.76no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.693.61
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)no data
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)18 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature64 °C69 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066
Maximum memory size375 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 3.69
Xeon X7550 4.96
+34.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 5862
Xeon X7550 7873
+34.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.69 4.96
Recency 6 March 2012 1 January 2010
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Xeon E5-1620 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X7550, on the other hand, has a 34.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Xeon X7550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-1620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Xeon X7550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Xeon X7550
Xeon X7550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 169 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Xeon X7550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Xeon X7550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.