Pentium N3510 vs Xeon E5-1620

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
3.76
+571%
Pentium N3510
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 7 Watt
0.56

Xeon E5-1620 outperforms Pentium N3510 by a whopping 571% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14812826
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.65no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency2.696.93
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)1 December 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313$161

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size294 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1333
Maximum memory size375 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes404
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 3.76
+571%
Pentium N3510 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 5863
+568%
Pentium N3510 878

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 610
+286%
Pentium N3510 158

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 2248
+299%
Pentium N3510 563

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.76 0.56
Recency 6 March 2012 1 December 2013
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 7 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 has a 571.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Pentium N3510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1757.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium N3510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium N3510 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Pentium N3510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Pentium N3510
Pentium N3510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Pentium N3510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Pentium N3510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.