Atom D525 vs Xeon E5-1620

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1481not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.63no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency2.69no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)Pinetrail (2009−2011)
Release date6 March 2012 (12 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$313$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.83 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache10240 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size294 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature64 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,270 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAEno data32 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size375 GB4 GB
Max memory channels41
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel GMA 3150

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 5864
+1359%
Atom D525 402

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 610
+692%
Atom D525 77

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 2251
+1104%
Atom D525 187

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2012 21 June 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 13 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom D525, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D525 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620
Xeon E5-1620
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 168 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 216 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.