FX PRO-8800P vs Xeon E5-1620 v4

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1275not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.91no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon E5no data
Power efficiency3.15no data
Architecture codenameBroadwell-EP (2016)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)2 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$294no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache64K (per core)320 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per module)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size246.24 mm2250 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors3200 Million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2011FP4
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size1.5 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R7 8CU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes408

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 2 June 2015
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v4 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX PRO-8800P, on the other hand, has 833.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a server/workstation processor while FX PRO-8800P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v4 and FX PRO-8800P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
Xeon E5-1620 v4
AMD FX PRO-8800P
FX PRO-8800P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 47 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate FX PRO-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v4 or FX PRO-8800P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.