A8-7680 vs Xeon E5-1620 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v3
2014
4 cores / 8 threads, 140 Watt
4.40
+97.3%
A8-7680
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
2.23

Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms A8-7680 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13341825
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A8
Power efficiency2.974.69
Architecture codenameHaswell-EP (2014−2015)Excavator (2017−2018)
Release date8 September 2014 (10 years ago)29 October 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data38
L1 cache64K (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache10 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size356 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors2,600 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth68 GB/s14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon R7 Series

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v3 4.40
+97.3%
A8-7680 2.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v3 6993
+97.3%
A8-7680 3544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 2.23
Recency 8 September 2014 29 October 2018
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v3 has a 97.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A8-7680, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 211.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7680 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v3 is a server/workstation processor while A8-7680 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v3 and A8-7680, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
Xeon E5-1620 v3
AMD A8-7680
A8-7680

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 133 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 511 votes

Rate A8-7680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v3 or A8-7680, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.