Pentium III 1400S vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.05no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.00no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)January 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate0 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)8 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm130 nm
Die size160 mm280 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2011370
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt32 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes40no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 6550
+3276%
Pentium III 1400S 194

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 32 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v2 has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 490.9% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium III 1400S, on the other hand, has 306.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium III 1400S is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium III 1400S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Pentium III 1400S
Pentium III 1400S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Pentium III 1400S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Pentium III 1400S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.