Pentium G4400T vs Xeon E5-1620 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E5-1620 v2
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
4.20
+180%
Pentium G4400T
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.50

Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms Pentium G4400T by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13862154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.080.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Pentium
Power efficiency3.003.98
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge-E (2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$315$64

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 has 1056% better value for money than Pentium G4400T.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate0 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache10 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size160 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2011FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guard+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600
Maximum memory size256 GB64 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth59.7 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data950 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 4.20
+180%
Pentium G4400T 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 6547
+179%
Pentium G4400T 2344

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 648
+7.3%
Pentium G4400T 604

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E5-1620 v2 2390
+125%
Pentium G4400T 1063

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.20 1.50
Recency 1 September 2013 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon E5-1620 v2 has a 180% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Pentium G4400T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-1620 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4400T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E5-1620 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G4400T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E5-1620 v2 and Pentium G4400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Pentium G4400T
Pentium G4400T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 112 votes

Rate Xeon E5-1620 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 51 vote

Rate Pentium G4400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E5-1620 v2 or Pentium G4400T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.